Lowest Tar And Nicotine Cigarettes Brands

Lowest Tar And Nicotine Cigarettes Brands Average ratng: 5,1/10 1275 votes
  1. Lowest Tar And Nicotine
Brands

Smokers who buy low-tar cigarettes in the hope they will not have such a bad effect on their health are mistaken, according to research. A study of almost one million Americans examined links between the amount of tar in the cigarettes smoked and deaths from lung cancer over six years.

Keep following us for more Free E-Books for various exams we would be keep giving you the free PDF for the books. English grammar books free pdf. Hope you have a enjoyable preparations and surely you can clear your written exams.

Tar

They found the risks of lung cancer between smokers of very low tar cigarettes (7mg or less) and low tar brands (8-14mg) were indistinguishable from those who smoked medium tar products (15-21mg). The research, published in the British Medical Journal, follows an EU directive last year meaning tobacco manufacturers are no longer allowed to use terms such as 'light' and 'mild' in their branding. Cancer Research UK also launched a 'death repackaged' campaign to urge people not to be taken in by the marketing ploys of tobacco companies which try to make low tar and mild cigarettes appear less harmful or healthier than others. Researchers from the American Cancer Society looked at the link between tar rating and lung cancer deaths in 364,239 men and 576,535 women over the age of 30.

Lowest Tar And Nicotine

No matter what the tar level of their current brand, all current smokers had a far greater risk of lung cancer than people who had never smoked or who had managed to quit. They found that even when factors such as diet and medical history were considered, there was no difference between the health of low tar and medium tar smokers. O re piya lyrics. But there was bad news for smokers of non-filtered cigarettes, with tar ratings of 22mg or more, who had even higher cancer risks. The researchers said that their findings were consistent with other evidence that smokers of low-tar brands smoke them more intensively. They also said it challenged the assumption that the more tar contained in the cigarettes the greater the risk of lung cancer. The authors concluded: 'Reducing the use of high tar non-filter cigarettes may provide limited public health benefits in those countries where such products are commonly used.